OpenWrt Forum Archive

Topic: Strange behaviour with WRT54GL V1.1

The content of this topic has been archived on 26 Apr 2018. There are no obvious gaps in this topic, but there may still be some posts missing at the end.

Hi All !

Kamikaze 8.09 branch : 2.4 for Broadcom

Well, let's say i'm trying to get a fix IP@ for my WAN port :
#### WAN configuration
config interface        wan
        option ifname   "eth0.1"
        option proto    static
        # option proto  dhcp
        option ipaddr   172.16.94.245
        option netmask  255.255.255.0
        option gateway  172.16.94.250
       
No way to ping 172.16.94.250 !!!

root@crys:~# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
172.16.94.0     *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0.1
192.168.94.0    *               255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 br-lan0
default         172.16.94.250   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0.1
root@crys:~# ping 172.16.94.250
PING 172.16.94.250 (172.16.94.250): 56 data bytes

--- 172.16.94.250 ping statistics ---
8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
root@crys:~#


But with :

#### WAN configuration
config interface        wan
        option ifname   "eth0.1"
        option proto    dhcp
        # option proto  static
        # option ipaddr 172.16.94.245
        # option netmask        255.255.255.0
        # option gateway        172.16.94.250
        # option dns    "172.16.94.250"

It works !!!

root@crys:~# ping 172.16.94.250
PING 172.16.94.250 (172.16.94.250): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.16.94.250: seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.325 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.94.250: seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.201 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.94.250: seq=2 ttl=64 time=4.584 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.94.250: seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.174 ms

--- 172.16.94.250 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 2.174/2.821/4.584 ms
root@crys:~#

DO YOU HAVE ANY CLUE TO HELP ??? :0(

Thanks to you

Wrong forum.....

Thanks.. it helps hard :0)

Could you please help me by indicating the good one ?

Thx

The discussion might have continued from here.