I want to compare OpenWRT with some other products.
(I have two D-Link boxes (DI-604 and DI-804HV) that work well under lighter load only...)
Topic: RC5: what is the NAT table size?
The content of this topic has been archived on 6 May 2018. There are no obvious gaps in this topic, but there may still be some posts missing at the end.
Page 1 of 1
This is Linux. Do you mean connection table size for routing? There are going to be more factors than table size.
But, if you must:
root@hazel:~# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max
5953
You would probably do better to ask yourself, what am I doing that is crushing this cheap router? And if my load is intense why am I using a $50 router?
(Last edited by vincentfox on 26 Apr 2006, 18:10)
Yes, but rumours are that D-Link's boxes have very small NAT tables (not more than 500 entryes)...
So I was curious.
I'm completely happy with WRT54GL OpenWRT RC5.
The discussion might have continued from here.
Page 1 of 1