xdpin wrote:Thank you very much 3ndymion for your time, and all the excellent detailed answer.
I believe your method maybe has more than 90% advantages then disadvantages.
Only some questions regarding the disadvantages please... (sorry I only read some things written by others)
1. This variant is called bridge mode?
2. Is it possible in this situation to appear double NAT?
3. The speed is only 10/10, could it appear some fluctuations, or even very slow speeds because using this method, instead of using only one router?
4. Tell me please could it appear any other disadvantages using this method?
5. Do you think it could be technical possible that the people from the ISP to ask the vendor of the routers
if they could tell what settings I should add/change/remove on a OpenWrt cable router to use it directly connected to the ISP?
6. Do you think it could be technical possible that the people from the ISP to ask the vendor of the routers to sell them some other models of routers, or this same model, but to add in their menu the Openvpn feature, so I could use it directly.
Thank you.
I'm not too sure about bridge mode, but I do not think this is it. This is definitely a double NAT setup. I have seen many complaints about double NAT, but it is working fine for me. It does not slow down speeds at all. I get download speeds of over 5MB/s (40Mb/s), & upload speeds almost the same. I think the most important thing about this is to have your router in the DMZ zone, that way it is not behind the ISP router's firewall, & you do not have to worry about any port forwarding.
Perhaps the best way to explain it is to give my own setup as an example. In my case, we have the ISP router (Actiontec MI424WR) as the main router. Everyone's computers & devices are connected to it, by wire & wirelessly. But for myself, I have my D-Link DIR-825 router connected to it, just like everyone else's devices. All of my own devices connect to my D-Link router. They are in their own little network, & they all connect to the internet just fine.
Actiontec Network: 192.168.1.XXX
D-Link Network (double NAT): 192.168.3.XXX
I have OpenWrt flashed onto my D-Link router, & I have an OpenVPN server running on the router. I do not want my D-Link router behind the firewall of the main Actiontec router. I think that might make things difficult because then I would have to start forwarding ports & stuff. So, I log into the Actiontec router, go to the ip address settings, & give my D-Link router a static address. Example: 192.168.1.20 That way, whenever I connect my router to the Actiontec, it will always get the same ip address of 192.168.1.20.
Now that my D-Link router gets a static ip address from the Actiontec, I go into the firewall settings of the Actiontec router & put the ip address 192.168.1.20 into the DMZ zone. That way, my D-Link router will always be in the DMZ zone. It is fully exposed to the internet, & is not being blocked by the Actiontec's firewall. Anything that comes to our home's external ip address will hit my D-Link router 1st, which is what I want.
And speaking of that, I also need to set up a dynamic DNS for my home's external ip address. When I'm away from home & want to reach my router from the outside world, I need to know the external ip address that my router can be reached at. Since the ISP often changes the external ip address for whatever reason, it is best to have a dynamic DNS setup so that I can use that DNS to call home to my router. The dynamic DNS will always know the external ip address for your home. There are different free services that can be used for this, such as noip.com, or duckdns.org.
In my case, I use noip.com for a dynamic DNS. The Actiontec router actually has a setting for noip.com built in. I'll choose a name I can remember, for example, my-awesome-router.ddns.net. So now that I set it up, I can connect to my-awesome-router.ddns.net whenever I'm away from home, & I will reach my router. OpenWrt's firewall protects my router, but I leave port 1194 open because the OpenVPN server can protect that port just like the firewall can.
This is how I use my setup, & it works perfect. I still have not tried using the router to connect to an actual paid-for VPN service like what you want to do, so I cannot really speak much on that. But, with a setup like mine, I do not think it would be too much trouble. I highly doubt that any ISP would be willing to help with something like this in any way whatsoever. I think the only option is to do it yourself, which is why we are all here.
It took me years to learn all this stuff in my little spare time. I am not a professional, so if anybody who is more knowledgeable than me sees this, please feel free to chime in. 