The cryptoapi backported from 2.4.29.
--
Nico
Topic: buildroot patches : cryptoapi backport from 2.4.29
The content of this topic has been archived on 2 Apr 2018. There are no obvious gaps in this topic, but there may still be some posts missing at the end.
Page 1 of 1
Nico wrote:
The cryptoapi backported from 2.4.29.
do you know about the experimental tree with kernel 2.4.29?
do you know about the experimental tree with kernel 2.4.29?
You mean your experimental tree, as seen on irc (20050124) ?
[21:31] <wbx> i got a 2.4.29 bootet. one issue is unresolved, loading the wlan driver on bootup produces a segmentation fault
[21:31] <[mbm]> obviously ..
[21:31] <[mbm]> still surprised that 2.4.29 booted
[21:32] <[mbm]> who patched that kernel?
[21:33] <wbx> me. so it will contain _strange_ patches :}
--
Nico
Nico wrote:
do you know about the experimental tree with kernel 2.4.29?
You mean your experimental tree, as seen on irc (20050124) ?[21:31] <wbx> i got a 2.4.29 bootet. one issue is unresolved, loading the wlan driver on bootup produces a segmentation fault
[21:31] <[mbm]> obviously ..
[21:31] <[mbm]> still surprised that 2.4.29 booted
[21:32] <[mbm]> who patched that kernel?
[21:33] <wbx> me. so it will contain _strange_ patches :}
yes. that is 2 weeks old. the wlan driver is working now and
the patches are cleaned up a lot. After some cleanup in the cache code I will even try to send patches to the linux-mips project.
yes. that is 2 weeks old. the wlan driver is working now and
the patches are cleaned up a lot. After some cleanup in the cache code I will even try to send patches to the linux-mips project.
Does this mean we could expect a OpenWRT release with a 2.4.29 kernel?
The discussion might have continued from here.
Page 1 of 1