@dlang

Several sources point out that radar is very specific about how they "pulse".

It is a disappointment to find out there is no rhyme or reason to the detection method.

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/dfs

Please register on vote on this , so it gets fixed soon.

Hamy wrote:

Please register on vote on this , so it gets fixed soon.

Hamy, the solution is posted in the comments.  I haven't tried it so I don't know if it works, but why not just go to:

     target/linux/mvebu/base-files/lib/upgrade/linksys.sh

in your build environment and add the recommended line at the end of the file and commit the change.

Depending on the actual fix committed you may have to manage the merge (if it's formatted differently) or you may have to revert your personal commit that fixed it.  In the mean time you don't have to wait around for the "official" fix to get committed.

@Hamy
https://git.lede-project.org/?p=source. … 2c03e39fce

Malachi wrote:

Sorry but $50 is too low.
The 2.4ghz isn't as strong or fast as my rt-ac68u.
I haven't tried openwrt on it yet but it behaved the same way on dd-wrt and stock.
So I figure it's just my environment where Broadcom works better.

I'm assuming stock firmware would be the best, though lacking in features. I don't use anything but wifi and one lan pc.

Try this i mage before you get rid of your WRT, I am running a V2 on it and extremely happy with it.

htt ps://m eg a.n z/ #F!7A0xFZJY!As3Zmj2fXNFa2QBaXPExKw

It is based on Openwrt, but is a full and complete image.
!st login password is "password" will prompt you to change it.

Yeehaw
commit 5f80315634c66a647aed9673e10582acd8462d69
More fun.
Cool! jow fixed it.

guys, how to set build env to use OS-s gcc 6.2 ?

$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 6.2.0-3ubuntu11~16.04' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-6/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-6 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-libmpx --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-6-amd64/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-6-amd64 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-6-amd64 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --enable-objc-gc --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.2.0 20160901 (Ubuntu 6.2.0-3ubuntu11~16.04)

@davidc502
r1777
is fine here only been 2.7 hrs. uptime but so far so good.

davidc502 wrote:

@dlang

Several sources point out that radar is very specific about how they "pulse".

It is a disappointment to find out there is no rhyme or reason to the detection method.

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/dfs

@davidc502,

The radar detection on the WRT1x00 series is implemented in the Marwell wireless chipset firmware. not in the mac80211 driver.
Since the firmware is 'closed source', who knows what kind of algorithm or detection method is used, but it seems something is not 100% right with their implementation.
There are just too many 'false positives'.

mojolacerator wrote:

Just wondering if arokh's should be removed? no update since April 16/16

I personally believe users benefit from this option, as arokh's build is highly customized and extremely stable, truly meant to be a complete OOBE.  Stability isn't necessarily defined by a build being updated regularly, thereby not necessitating an update unless one is needed.  Arokh's still active in his Build Info thread, with their last post being 8/26 (last post in their thread is from 9/15).

I'm just one perspective, so it's important others share theirs as well.

JW0914 wrote:

mojolacerator wrote:

Just wondering if arokh's should be removed? no update since April 16/16

I personally believe users benefit from this option, as arokh's build is highly customized and extremely stable, truly meant to be a complete OOBE.  Stability isn't necessarily defined by a build being updated regularly, thereby not necessitating an update unless one is needed.  Arokh's still active in his Build Info thread, with their last post being 8/26 (last post in their thread is from 9/15).

I'm just one perspective, so it's important others share theirs as well.

for the various community builds, could you add a link to the place where that build is being discussed/supported? Yes, they will mostly point here, but not all of them will (as this sub-thread discusses)